Tuesday, December 11, 2007
12/11/07 blog prompt
2). I am starting to like this book more than i did in the beginning because of how the story is starting to progress. Before about the 60th page in the book it was all nice and perfect but to me i kno things are never perfect so when there is some action starting to be revealed i like it more.
Saturday, December 8, 2007
12/08/07 Lit. Circle Pgs.1-77
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Interveiw Questions
1. What are your ideas on the topic of organic farming?
2. Do you believe farming without pesticides and other chemicals is the way to go?
3. What is your opinion on agricultural and man made chemicals?
4. Does organic farming mean that no chemicals at all are used?
5. What types of chemicals are considered pesticides and agricultural chemicals that are used in farming?
6. Does the fact that you work in a health foods store make an impact on your answers?
7. Do you consider yourself a person who is conscious over nature?
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Tap water
Monday, October 8, 2007
This site is pretty good four our topic on reclaimed or recycled water. It also has other links to other water facts and the best thing is that the statistics come from our very own san diego.
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Tap Water
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
remmedial water
This information was found on:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6627089-description.html
Monday, October 1, 2007
water resources for annes class!!!!
http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife/extreme/withoutwater/
http://www.redcross.org/news/in/health/010322waterside.html
these websites explain what life is with and without water and how important water is. I think that they are very good introductory articles for the project.
Thursday, September 27, 2007
Pesticides and their effects on farming.
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
White priviledge: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
group progress.
Monday, September 17, 2007
REMEMBER!!!
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
presentation
Monday, September 10, 2007
ancient artifacts....
http://www.myarmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=4928
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
First Post.. 9/4/07
Thursday, May 17, 2007
due thurs. 5/17
I underlined the sentence when socrates was attacking his prosecuter when his prosecuter got confused with another philosopher and said that socrates had said he believed in gods but he didint.
I thought that when socrates had confronted the guy and told him he confused him whith another philosopher, showed that the prosecuter was unprepared and could have been one of the strong points in his arguement.
Wednesday, May 16, 2007
The Apology Due wed. 5/16
1A)"Well then, Meletus, you've given ample proof that you have never bothered your head about the young; and you make it perfectly clear that you have never paid the slightest attention to the matters over which you are now indicting me."
This quote really jumped out at me. What this is, is the result of Socrates using Dialectics on one of his accusers. He simply tried to get the man to explain his accusation, and got his opinion on different matters related to that accusation. What ended up happening, was Meletus answered the questions just as Socrates had thought he would, and by doing so, showed a fatal flaw in his judgment or idea of judgment. I chose this because it seemed like an especially important quote, seeing as he ripped open one of the claims against him.
pericles funeral oration due wed. 5/15
-They don't try to block their land; they are open to the world
-Individuals are not only interested in their own affairs but in the state's as well.
-They make friends by doing good to others, not by receiving good from them.
These could be good to the debate because these might oppose Socrates' viewpoints. That means he would be the only one who opposes them, which could give them an excuse to attack him.
Monday, April 23, 2007
Due tues. 4/24
2) Write a paragraph where you state your opinion on the issue. It should include some evidence from the reading, but it does not have to follow each viewpoint to the letter. You can also include ideas and evidence from other sources or individuals.
Due monday 4/23 viewpoints
1) For chapter 1, write three things based on the reading that supports the above resolution. This is the "pro" argument.
America is crippling because people want to express themselves too much. People cross the line, and the young have access to explicit content, so they have all this knowledge at a young age.
2) For chapter 2, write three things based on the reading that goes against the above resolution. This is the "con" argument.
If we had no freedom to express ourselves, everything would be heavily edited and screened. Also, there will be protests and rebels who will try to go outside of the law. America is really the only "free" country, and it should stay that way.
3) Write a paragraph where you state your opinion on the issue. It should include some evidence from the reading, but it does not have to follow each viewpoint to the letter. You can also include ideas and evidence from other sources or individuals.
I think that people should have the right to express any type of view, because if you censor that bad idea that someone has, there is a essentially a missing piece to the puzzle. I think it should be up to the parents, however, to block these ideas from small children until the time is right, according to them. We should not, however, block ideas and ban them completely and from everyone.
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Don Imus contraversy
Because his comments were racist and sexist, and they should not allow comments like that should not be said on televsion.
2. According to Frank Rich, why should Imus not be silenced?
Because he has freedom opf speech, and he doesn't make fun of a certain group of people, he makes fun of everyone.
3. Do you think Imus should be silenced? Why?
Not really, and maybe its because I don't get easily offended, but I think comments like that are OK. You are not being made to watch the show. You can get the remote and flip it to another channel. If on the other hand, you are being made to listen to racist comments that apply to you, and you are being forced, there is a problem. He has freedom of speech though, and you have the freedom to change the channel. Plus if the rutgers girls even said themselves that they werent upseted that much by the comments and that he is forgiven so it should not be a problem.
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
the republic due 4/18
1A)I think that what he is doing by restricting the arts so much will have bad effects on the men. Because what he is really doing is constricting the men's creative release, and by doing so he will plant seeds of rebellion. In the end, it would probably help further the end of his utopian society. Pretty soon afterwards, they men will realize they do not believe in the restrictions, and start acting of their own accord. Whether that would be good or bad is unknown to me, but one things is for sure. Constrictions such as this are only there to be broken.
GYMNASTICS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lAXdDREEaE
its you tube so only click on it at home
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
due 3/28
I think that they would ban Homer because it incites violence and ideas that would not be good for society, such as betrayal and disobedience to your superior. These ideas may influence people in society and make them do those things, causing a disturbance
2. Then read pp. 76-85 (Section b). Secondary or Literary Education)
3. Short Answers – Text based questions. Answer both questions, answers can be just a few sentences
a. According to Plato, what are some aspects of poetry that should be banned and why? In other words, how can poetry undermine the education of a Guardian?
And
b. What should poetry “teach” and why?
Characters that lie, or disrespect the king. Also decribing the afterlife as a dark, gloomy place. Also get rid of the horrifying names and places in the underworld.
4. If you were talking to Plato what would you say to him? Do you agree with his ideas? Do you think poetry, or literature in general, should be put to the purposes that he says it should?
Monday, March 26, 2007
due 3/27
I think that they would ban Hesiod and Homer because both writings incite violence and ideas that would not be good for society, such as betrayal and disobedience to your superior. These ideas may influence people in society and make them do those things.
2) a. What are Homer and Hesiod guilty of?Misrepresenting the nature of gods and heroes.
b. What are the two main characteristics of “god” and what are the laws/principles of story telling based on those characteristics?1) Gods acts were good and just, and those being punished had benefitted from it.
It is impossible for a god to wish himself to change.
3) Compare what you wrote in your personal reflection above (#1) with what Plato wrote. How close were you to what Plato wrote?
I was off. He said to censor things because of what they made the gods look like. I thought they censored because of bad ideas that might spring up in people's mind.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Due 3/22
In my mind the best definition of justice to one is something that one feels is morally correct. Unfortunatly this does may not work for everbody, for instance if one person thinks that expressing yourself through violence is just, and another person thinks the opposite the morals collide and we have a situation that doesn't fit together. In the end, the only kind of justice that can work in a society is through some sort of compromisation. The best definition for justice in a society is a moral system that works to benifit everybody. This way everybody is happy and unharmed. Unfortunatly this is an example of a utopia that is not possible with our human society. People do not all share the same moral system and cannot function as a perfect whole without there being someone to screw it all up.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
due 3/21
I think acting right could help your happiness because in the back of your mind all u need to do to become happy is to remember all the good things you did for yourself or other peole and forget about all the bad things. I think that socrates would probably ask a question trying to attract my thinking somewhere else and try to get me confused / get me to have another opinion.
Monday, March 19, 2007
due 3/20 republic assignment
Thursday, March 15, 2007
DUE Fri 3/16/07
Polemarchus is a resident in Piraeus, the port of Athens
Cephalus is a Syracusan, and also an old man who believes that people should embrace old age.What is the profession of Cephalus?
Cephalus is old, and I think hes a philosopher? It is sort of hard to understand
What was Cephalus doing right before the discussion that took place?
Cephalus was sitting in a chair, sacrificing.
According to Cephalus, what are the virtues of old age?
When you are old, you must be happy with your life or you will be nothing but depressed, with nothing to look forward to but death. He says that you must forget all your troubles and then you will be content.What are Cephalus’ view of justice?
What is Socrates response?
Do you agree with Cephalus or with Socrates? Why?
If you don't agree with either of them, write about which one you think makes the stronger arguement - even if you think it is not "right" - and why?>>
I agree with Cephalus about the virtues of old age...he talks about men who just sit on their butts all day and disregard everything around them. They disrespect their family and don't look at anything optimistically. Basically, the old people are just waiting to die. Cephalus says that once you are old and content with your life, all the desires and sadness leaves your life and you are happy with being old. But then Socrates asks Cephalus about being rich, which Cephalus doesn't seem to care about much. So Socrates asks Cephalus if he actually made the money that he has or if he inherited it. Cephalus didn't make it himself, but he doesn't use the money for his advantage, so Socrates is surprised.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
DUE THUR, 3/15 Similie of the Cave Reading Questions. Section Two
1A) Well, they are exactly what Socrates speaks of. Those prisoners who are just chained up and don't question anything. Because in the book Bradbury says that the whole world is ignorant and only is attracted to media and such frivolous things. In F451, the society was controlled by the media, and brainwashed into believing that whatever the media said was real, and there was no need to question it because there wasn't any room for it to be wrong. I believe They are the prisoners who choose to be imprisoned. If you make a decision to be ignorant, like Mildred and many people used to do, then you are solidifying your belief that everything you are given by the governing body or belief is true, whether you really believe it or not.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
LIAR
I think that one time when i was little my parents always tried to make me eat veggies like broccolli and spinach but i thought i was such a mastermind and threw them behind my couch, which for one made it stink and my parents ended up cleaning behind the couch for some odd reason and they found them. a couple of weeks later they said if i ate my broccolli and did not throw it behind the couch that i would be able to play outside and have a great big bol of ice cream... that night i asked if i could have ice cream they flat out ignored me.
Thursday, March 1, 2007
DUE FRI 3/2 Personal Reflection
Well one time i was playing football and i was doing real well. I thought i was so good that i good whoop on anyone who tried to play. so one day after school i was playing with some tenth graders and they wanted to play tackle so i agreed. I was getting smashed everytime i turned around. Im not saying I lost but all im saying is that i really paid for my pride.
2). How was your pride, or the other person's, similiar or different to that of Achilles?
well i really dont see a similarity between my pride and achilles except the fact that achilles and i were both prideful over a skill type of thing, for example footbal or fighting or running...etc..
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
DUE THR 3/1 Iliad Reading
2. On p. 413 line 35 (approximately), Patroclus tells Achilles that Achilles is “cursed in [his] own courage.” What does Patroclus mean by that and do you agree with him?
2.Well i think that patroclus is trying to say that Achilles is so courageous that it is possible to hurt his self and well being. I agree with patroclus because going back to the movie when he was the first one on shore and started fighting with about only 20 men, I think that it would have been possible for him to die because he was courageous.
3. Either ask questions about the text or write down vocab words from the text with definitions.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Illiad pg. 266-275 lines 521-869 due Wed. 2/28
1A)Is Achilles so encased in his pride he ingores his allies' cry for help?
2Q) What was your opinion of Achilles before reading Book 9? Does it change after reading Book 9? Explain why or why not.
2A)I see him as more arrogant than i did before, but then again it is slightly justified, so my opinion didn't change much.
3Q) Same as yesterday - Make a list of the persuasive strategy used by these characters
3A) Who is speaking?
Ajax
What does that person say and to whom does he say it?
He is speaking to Achilles, trying to persuade him to help the Achaeans.
What persuasive strategy is it?
Appeal to Reason
Why is it an example of that strategy?
Because he is trying to tell Achilles that he is being a fool with the situation, and that he is un-honorable for not helping his comrades.
Who is speaking?
Achilles
What does that person say and to whom does he say it?
hes talking to the people who went to reason with Achilles
What persuasive strategy is it?
Appeal to Emotion
Why is it an example of that strategy?
Because he is trying to tell the men that he should not have to fight for Agamemnon and that Agamemnom should be fighting in his own wars.
Monday, February 26, 2007
The Illiad Assignment Due 2/27/06
I really do not have any questions about the text so far. But overall I really like book nine it is a little interesting and is a nice book to read.
2.What was your opinion of Achilles before reading Book 9? Does it change after reading Book 9? Explain why or why not.
Well in this section the person i most saw a change in would have to be agamemnon because i thought he was a self centered guy who really didnt give a piss about anyone else. In this book he is a much better person and tries to make amends for what he had said earlier to Achilles but Achilles refused to accept amends. I did however see a change in Achilles because he is even more obnoxious and more of a trader and lets the achaens fall.
3Q) Make a list of persuasive strategies used by characters:Who is speaking?
Odysseus
What does that person say and to whom does he say it?
He is speaking to Achilles
What persuasive strategy is it?
Appeal to Emotion
Why is it an example of that strategy?
Because Odysseus keeps trying to use his words to make Achilles feel bad for the Achaeans, and use that sadness in order to make him fight with the Achaeans and help them kill the Trojans.
Who is speaking?
Achilles
What does that person say and to whom does he say it?
He is speaking to Odysseus and the men who went with him to see Achilles
What persuasive strategy is it?
Appeal to Reason
Why is it an example of that strategy?
Because Achilles tries to tell them his side of the story, and explain to them that it is illogical for him to go back on his word because it would impact his honor.
Who is speaking?
Nestor
What does that person say and to whom does he say it?
He is speaking to Agamemnon and Achilles
What persuasive strategy is it?
Appeal to Reason
Why is it an example of that strategy?
Because he is trying to tell them that the arguement they are having will surely mean the end of the Achaean army, because in one way they lose Achilles, and the other way the king loses his honor.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
DUE THR 2/22 - Disagreements and Fights ...
DUE THR 2/22 - Disagreements and Fights ...
DUE THR 2/22 Iliad Reflection - Book One
A) Achilles’ rage is justified and I support his decision not to fight, even if it means the Greeks might lose lots of men, or even the war itself.
Or
B) Agamemnon is the commander, as such he is in the right, and I support his decision to ask for Achilles’ war prize Briseis – even if it means that Achilles will sit out the war.
I myself would agree with achilles because of the fact that he does not want to fight because his king is being selfish and only cares about winning the war. I think that achilles stance is the best way to go because agamemnon is not even his king and he still is ordering him around like he is one of his own men and I agree 100% with achilles.
Monday, February 12, 2007
My Rage-Cause
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
Farenhiet 9/11 due feb.8
2. Take one of the characters in the scene and rewrite it (or something similar) from that person’s perspective.well if I were Montag I would be really pissed at the kids for not knowing how to drive properly. I also I might have pied my pants because things like that give me a real rush.
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Hesiod writing assignment due we 2/7
2. Make a list of the descriptive words in that scene – minimum of 3, but you should be able to find a lot
3. Write a short paragraph of why you think that scene and the words Bradbury used were effective in representing fear. This is like the assignment from last night expect with Bradbury.4. If there are words you don't know write them down.
Later, I will ask you to write a paragraph from the perspective of one of the characters in the scene that uses descriptive words. This is in preparation for that. The idea here is that you are exposed to your classmates writing and the words they use effectivly, do the same with Bradbury, and then do your own.
Hesiod writing assignment due wed 2/7
In my opinion I think the most represented need in the story would have to be power. For example when all the gods eat thier children because they do not want the prophecy of their children overthrowing them.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
farenheit 451 Pgs. 154-165
Monday, January 29, 2007
Farenheit 451 pgs. 138-154
A). I was wondering if anyone could tell me if the book said whether or not the mechanical hound was programmed to attack people with books even if your a fireman yourself.?
Farenheit 451 pgs.126-137
A: The part that I found most interesting was when Montag was starting to cross the street to get to Faber's house. I liked this part because the way Ray Bradbury described his journey across the street was so great that i almost felt myself walking across a street. I have been in a position like this when i am so scared to look left or right because either im embarrased or I just am really truley scared.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Debunking 9/11 chapter 3 Big Plane Small Holes
Fact: The fact states that the initial hole made was 90 feet wide and that the measurments that the Building performance report took said that the hole said by conspiracy theorists that was 16 feet wide was only because the building had crumbled 19 minutes after the crash which was obviously enough time to take measurements. The fact also states the fact that how could the winspan of 124 foot 10 inches wide fit into a 90 foot hole?. Well they say that an eye whitness named Frank Probst saw the crash and said that the two wings were destroyed by the power generator not too far from the pentagon.
Anaylisis: Well in my opinion i think that the claim would be the best way to go for two reasons. First the fact said that the building had crumbled 19 minutes after the crash which means they wouldnt have had enough time to measure themselves so were did they get the number 90 feet.? The final reason is their eye whitness Frank Probst, i mean the fact said that he dove out of the way right? So how is it possible to dive and be looking at the wings at the same time.?
Farenhiet 451 Pgs. 110-125
A: I think that this part was a very interesting one in fact I rather much enjoyed it more than the rest of the book. Well Montag was caught with some books in his house and because your not allowed to have books he had to burn his house down and out of anger and retaliation he burned beatty to death.
Q: Copy down one sentence from this reading selection that strikes you as particularly descriptive. Which of the 5 senses does it appeal to? What verbs, adjectives, or figurative language are used and why are they effective in describing a certain action, person, or thing?
A: The sentence i found most interesting was : "The Books leapt and danced like roasted birds, their wings ablaze with read and yellow feathers." I thought this was interesting because the red and yellow birds described the colors of the fire and saying that they were flying described the sparks of the fire.
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
What I Most Enjoy
Farenheit 451 Pgs.81-91
A: Faber says it won’t work for two reasons. 1: No one can set the fires. The second reason is that you cant trust anyone else. I think it would work because If you have books no matter your occupation your home should be burnt down.
Monday, January 22, 2007
Farenheit 451 Pgs.71-80
A: I did not understand why Professor Fabor hung up on Montag when he asked him about the books and how many copies were left...? I mean he was asking a simple question.
Q: What does Montag mean when he says that books "point, one way or another, to Clarisse?"
A: I think that Montag compares Clarisse to Books because Clarisse is always talking about the past and is always give her thoughts and i deas. She is also very informative and most books have the same characteristics as Clarisse.
Farenheit 451 Pgs.40-68
This part of the story was when Montag was having doubts about his job and if he was doing the right thing by being a fireman. That is why Captain Beatty came to his house to clear things up for him and convince him that their job helps others in a great way. Beatty tells Montag that the greatest thing anyone could ever get out of life is happiness. Therefore, a job of a fireman is to make everyone happy. Beatty said, "Colored people don't like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don't feel good about Uncle Tom's Cabin. Burn it." Basically, captain beatty just wanted guy to burn all his books.
Friday, January 19, 2007
What I Dread Most....
Farenhiet 451 pg.3-21
2.) The author conveyed the distance of guy montag and his wife when he was imagining his wife waiting for him in bed but then he said that that had not happened in two years. I thought that was how he conveyed their distance because normal couples are waiting in bed for eachother on a normal basis but he made it seem like the were a normal couple.
Farenhiet 451 pg. 21-40
Why does the mechanical hound want to hurt Guy? It doesn't seem like he should - after all, he the dog is supposed to work with him..
2) Montag compares Mildred (his wife) to Clarisse and says that Clarisse seems older. In what way does Mildred act more mature and WHY do you think she is more mature? Why does Bradbury (the author) make the contrast between the two?
I think Clarisse seems more mature than Mildred because she relates to things from the past. Mildred seems to care about the present and expensive stuff, and doesn't give much though to anything or anyone else. Even though carisse is considered a weirdo because she doesnt d much of the things that the others either dont want to do because they are afraid of what people think but carisse is more of a down to earth person. If i were guy i would chose clarisse because she is a true person.
